A Review Of case laws on bail
A Review Of case laws on bail
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The main target is over the intention to cause injury. This can be a major trouble: an extremely lower threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to make it suitable towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed into the court in which the case has become or will be filed.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are topic to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of your petitioners for promotion can be regarded, however, we've been clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy topic into the approval on the competent authority.
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed by the respondent/Institute, these rules might not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework in the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what has become discussed previously mentioned, without touching the merits on the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of your petition is sustained and the petition is held to generally be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 from the Constitution with the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio of your judgment passed because of the Supreme Court while in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is very well-settled that when thinking of the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent read more authority must look at the benefit of each of the eligible candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of suitable candidates who are found to become most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded because of the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part in the respondent department.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a chance of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
P.C. Liability of petitioners for your mentioned offences would be determined through the realized trial Court after sifting the evidentiary well worth in the material made before the same. Till then, case of
Please note, For anyone who is seeking a payment exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Criminal cases Inside the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil law systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions constant with the previous decisions of higher courts.
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion with the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
However, it’s essential to note that the application with the death penalty is subject to several legal safeguards and due process to be certain fair trials.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.